Both are fast, opinionated trackers. They are not built for the same size of team.
Four differences that change how you work. Not a feature list.
| What actually differs | minddy | Linear |
|---|---|---|
| What a teammate costs | Nothing, if they come to work on issues | One more paid seat |
| Your coding agents | They write the plan, then tick it off | They read and update issues |
| Before your first issue | Nothing to configure | Teams and workflows to define |
| Built for | One person or a small team | Product teams at scale |
Checked in July 2026 against public pages. Prices and limits move. Linear pricing
What Linear does better
- A deeper product: roadmaps, initiatives, triage rules, insights, a mature mobile app.
- Integrations with almost everything, and years of them being maintained.
- A large community, so an answer to your question already exists somewhere.
Where minddy is different
- Someone who joins to work on issues does not cost you a seat.
- Each issue carries its plan, and your agent ticks it off as the work goes.
- A public feedback board with votes, in the same tool, at no extra cost.
Pick Linear if several squads share a roadmap, if you need its integrations, or if seat pricing is not the constraint.
Pick minddy if you are one to five people, if your coding agents do a real share of the work, and if you want the tracker to stay out of the way.